Alright, I've gotten the forward behavior of https://bbchallenge.org/1RB2LA0LA_2LC---2RA_0RA2RC1LC fully (?) characterized:
```
C(a,b,c) = 0^∞ (12)^a 2^b C> 202 (202)^c 000
(0^∞ A> 0^∞) -> C(1,5,1) 0^∞
C(0,b,c) -> C(b+2,1,c-1) [c ≥ 1]
C(1,b,c) -> C(b+5,1,c-1) [c ≥ 1]
C(2,b,0) -> C(1,5,2) 0^(b-2) 202 [b ≥ 2]
C(a,b,0) -> C(1,5,a-3) 0^b 202 [a ≥ 3]
C(a,b,c) -> C(a-2,b+7,c-1) [a ≥ 2, c ≥ 1]
C(0,b,0) 0^5 -> C(1,5,b+1)
C(1,b,0) 0^5 -> C(1,5,b+4)
```
**EDIT:** The original version of this comment had two incorrect rules (shown below), which have been fixed above:
```
C(2,b,0) -> C(1,5,2) 0^(b+1) 202
C(a,b,0) -> C(1,5,a-3) 0^(b+3) 202 [a ≥ 3]
```
It's hard to determine whether the last two cases can ever occur at all, unless there's some modular invariant I'm not seeing. Also, if they do occur, I believe it's impossible for it to eat another `0^5` before a new `0^(b+1)` or `0^(b+3)` is added, but I don't have a formal proof of this.